|
Thomas Duke |
Cavendish Laboratory Madingley Road Cambridge CB3 0HE |
email: td18@cam.ac.uk tel: +44 1223 337256 fax: +44 1223 337356 |
|||||||
|
Research
Teaching
Miscellaneous |
[1] T.A.J. Duke, Tube model of field-inversion electrophoresis Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2877-2880 (1989).
[2] T.A.J. Duke, G.C. Barker and A. Mehta, Monte Carlo study of granular relaxation Europhys. Lett. 13, 19-24 (1990).
[3] T.A.J. Duke, Monte Carlo reptation model of gel electrophoresis: Steady state behavior J. Chem. Phys. 93, 9049-9054 (1990).
[4] T.A.J. Duke, Monte Carlo reptation model of gel electrophoresis: Response to field pulses J. Chem. Phys. 93, 9055-9061 (1990).
[5] T.A.J. Duke & J.L. Viovy, Simulation of megabase DNA undergoing gel electrophoresis Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 542-545 (1992).
[6] J.L. Viovy, T. Duke & F. Caron, The physics of DNA electrophoresis Contemp. Phys. 33, 1-40 (1992).
[7] T.A.J. Duke & J.L. Viovy, Motion of megabase DNA during field-inversion gel electrophoresis: investigation by non-local Monte Carlo J. Chem. Phys. 96, 8552-8563 (1992).
[8] T.A.J. Duke, A.N. Semenov & J.L. Viovy, Mobility of a reptating polymer Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3260-3263 (1992).
[9] T.A.J. Duke, Molecular mechanisms of DNA electrophoresis Intl. J. Genome Res. 1, 227-247 (1993).
[10] J.L. Viovy & T. Duke, DNA electrophoresis in polymer solutions: Ogston sieving, reptation and constraint release Electrophoresis 14, 322-329 (1993).
[11] T. Duke, J.L. Viovy & A.N. Semenov, Electrophoretic mobility of DNA in gels I: New biased reptation theory including fluctuations Biopolymers 34, 239-248 (1994).
[12] C. Heller, T. Duke & J.L. Viovy, Electrophoretic mobility of DNA in gels II: Systematic experimental study in agarose gels Biopolymers 34, 249-259 (1994).
[13] T. Duke and J.L. Viovy, Theory of DNA electrophoresis in physical gels and polymer solutions Phys. Rev. E 49, 2408-2415 (1994).
[14] W.D. Volkmuth, T. Duke, M.C. Wu, R.H. Austin & A. Szabo, DNA electrodiffusion in a 2-D array of posts Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2117-2120 (1994).
[15] J.L. Viovy & T. Duke, Solid friction and polymer relaxation in gel electrophoresis Science 264, 112-113 (1994).
[16] S.P. Obukhov, M. Rubinstein & T. Duke, Diffusion of a ring polymer in a gel Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1263-1266 (1994).
[17] T. Duke, T.E. Holy & S. Leibler, "Gliding assays" for motor proteins: A theoretical analysis Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 330-333 (1995).
[18] A.N. Semenov, T.A.J. Duke & J.L. Viovy, Gel electrophoresis of DNA in moderate fields: The effect of fluctuations Phys. Rev. E 51, 1520-1537 (1995).
[19] M.S. Hutson, G. Holzwarth, T.A.J. Duke & J.L. Viovy, Two-dimensional motion of DNA bands during 120û pulsed field gel electrophoresis I: Effect of molecular weight Biopolymers 35, 297-306 (1995).
[20] L.M. Neitzey, G. Holzwarth, T.A.J. Duke & J.L. Viovy, Two-dimensional motion of DNA bands during pulsed field gel electrophoresis II: Effect of field angle Biopolymers 35, 307-317 (1995).
[21] L. Bourdieu, T. Duke, M. Elowitz, D.A. Winkelman, S. Leibler & A. Libchaber, Spiral defects in motility assays: A measure of motor protein force Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 176-179 (1995).
[22] W.D. Volkmuth, T. Duke, R.H. Austin & E.C. Cox, Trapping of branched DNA in microfabricated structures Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6887-6892 (1995).
[23] T. Duke, R.H. Austin, E.C. Cox & S.S. Chan, Pulsed-field electrophoresis in microlithographic arrays Electrophoresis 17, 1075-1079 (1996).
[24] T. Duke & S. Leibler, Motor protein mechanics: A stochastic model with minimal mechano-chemical coupling Biophys. J. 71, 1235-1247 (1996).
[25] T. Duke, G. Monnelly, E.C. Cox & R.H. Austin, Sequencing in nanostructures: A feasibility study Electrophoresis 18, 17-22 (1997).
[26] R.H. Austin, J. Brody, E.C. Cox, T. Duke & W.D. Volkmuth, Stretch genes Physics Today 50.2, 32-38 (1997).
[27] T.A.J. Duke & R.H. Austin, Microfabricated sieve for the continuous sorting of macromolecules Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1552-1555 (1998).
[28] O.B. Bakajin, T.A.J. Duke, C.F. Chou, S.S. Chan, R.H. Austin & E.C. Cox, Electrohydrodynamic stretching of DNA in confined environments Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2737-2740 (1998).
[29] T. Duke, Separation techniques Current Opin. Chem. Biol. 2, 592-596 (1998).
[30] Y. Shi & T. Duke, Cooperative model of bacterial sensing Phys. Rev. E 58, 6399-6406 (1998).
[31] T.A.J. Duke, Molecular model of muscle contraction Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2770-2775 (1999).
[32] T.A.J. Duke & D. Bray, Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10104-10108 (1999).
[33] C.F. Chou, O.B. Bakajin, S.W. Turner, T.A.J. Duke, S.S. Chan, E.C. Cox, H.G. Craighead & R.H. Austin, Sorting by diffusion: an asymmetric obstacle course for continuous molecular separation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13762-13765 (1999).
[34] S. Camalet, T. Duke, F. Julicher & J. Prost, Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3183-3188 (2000).
[35] T.A.J. Duke, Cooperativity of myosin molecules through strain-dependent chemistry Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 355, 529-538 (2000).
[36] C.F. Chou, R.H. Austin, O. Bakajin, J.O. Tegenfeldt, J.A. Castelino, S.S Chan, E.C. Cox, H. Craighead, N. Darnton, T. Duke, J.Y. Han & S. Turner, Sorting biomolecules with microdevices Electrophoresis 21, 81-90 (2000).
[37] J.O. Tegenfeld, O. Bakajin, C.F. Chou, S.S. Chan, R. Austin, W. Fann, L. Liou, E. Chan, T. Duke & E.C. Cox, A near-field scanner for moving molecules Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1378-1381 (2001).
[38] T.A.J. Duke, N. le Novere & D. Bray, Conformational spread in a ring of proteins: a stochastic approach to allostery J. Mol. Biol. 308, 541-553 (2001).
[39] F. Julicher, D. Andor & T. Duke, The physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9080-9085 (2001).
[40] O. Bakajin, T.A.J. Duke, J.O. Tegenfeld, C.F. Chou, S.S. Chan, R.H. Austin & E.C. Cox, Separation of 100 kilobase DNA molecules in 10 seconds Anal. Chem. 73, 6053-6056 (2001).
[41] R.H. Austin, N. Darnton, R. Huang, O. Bakajin & T. Duke, Ratchets: The problem with boundary conditions in conducting solutions Applied Phys. A 75, 279-284 (2002).
[42] T. Duke, The power of hearing Physics World 15:5, 29-33 (2002).
[43] T. Duke, Push or pull? Teams of motor proteins have it both ways Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6521-6523 (2002).
Conference proceedings etc.
[1] T.A.J. Duke, Monte Carlo modelling of gel electrophoresis in 'Proceedings of the first international conference on electrophoresis, supercomputing and the human genome', eds. C.R. Cantor and H.A. Lim. (World Scientific 1991) pp. 75-85.
[2] T. Duke, The physics of DNA electrophoresis in 'Biologically inspired physics', ed. L. Peliti (Plenum 1991) pp. 71-80.
[3] T. Duke, Computer simulation of DNA electrophoresis Analusis 21, M29-31 (1993).
[4] T. Duke & R.H. Austin, Microchips for sorting DNA in 'Physics of biological systems', eds. H. Flyvbjerg et al. (Springer 1997) pp. 18- 25.
[5] O. Bakajin, T.A.J. Duke, C.F. Chou, J. Tegenfeldt, S.S. Chan, R.H. Austin & E.C. Cox, Microfabricated arrays for fractionation of large DNA molecules via pulsed-field electrophoresis in'Biological Physics: third international symposium', eds. H. Frauenfelder, G. Hummer and R. Garcia, pp. 243-248, AIP press (1999).
[6] T. Duke & F. Julicher, Les proteines motrices: la main d'oeuvre de la cellule Images de la Physique (2001).
[7] T. Duke, Models of motor protein systems Les Houches Lecture Notes (in press, 2002). |
||||||||