Search

A-Z index

Help

 

University of Cambridge Home

Physics Dept Home

TCM Group Home

University of Cambridge > Department of Physics. Cavendish Laboratory >  Theory of Condensed Matter > CoMePhS

 

Manganites

 

Phenomenological Theory of Doped Manganites

 

We start with the free energy of the commensurate-incommensurate phase transition

 

With the order parameters, ρ(r) the charge density, Ф(r) the incommensurate part of the charge density.  These come from the combined order parameter.   G is a reciprocal lattice vector and so Ф(r) represents the incommensurate part of the charge density.  Solutions where Ф(r) is constant represent commensurate solutions, that is where the charge density variation is commensurate with the lattice.

 

If we make the phase modulation only approximation, that is where ρ(r) is constant, this leads to solutions of the form

 

for n>2.   This is the sine-gordon equation of a forced harmonic oscillator.  The solutions are jacobi amplitude functions which have jumps (solitions). The jumps are as a result of the comptetition between the elastic and umklapp, the last two terms in the free energy respectively

 

All this can be seen in many sources, for example the book Tolèdano and Tolèdano “The Landau Theory of Phase Transitions” (World Scientific 1987).

 

 

Including Magnetisation

 

To include mangetisation we must add to the free energy

Figure 1a

 

And must allow the charge ordering to interact with magnetic ordering and so we must include some coupling terms to the free energy,  To lowest order these are

 and

It is worth noting that the second of these terms is linear,  that is because the sign of  really does mater.   If the chemical doping is away from the incommensurate period then small pockets of carriers are available at the fermi surface.  The type of carrier will depend on the term’s sign and so has to be included linearly to reflect the potential electron/hole asymmetry.

 

The new free energy can be minimized numerically and if one sets the magnetic coupling to the free energy to be small,  so d1 << d2 and am and bm much less than the corresponding parameters in the charge density we find a very good agreement with the transitions observed in experiment.  

 

Figure 1a shows the experimentally measured incommensurate wave vector, scaled by the reciprocal lattice vector against temperature for different dopings of two different manganites.  The antiferromagnetic transition temperature and charge ordering temperatures are shown as TAF and TCO respectively.  This data was gathered from a number of experimental sources which are acknowledged.

 

Figure 1 b

The inset graph shows the low temperature incommensurate wave vector as a function of the doping, That is the x in La1-x Cax MnO3  or the Pr1-x Cax MnO3.

 

The phenomenalogical model reproduces the experimental data, as can be seen in Figure 1b.   TL represents the “lock-in” temperature, that is the temperature at which the incommensurate-commensurate transition takes place.  TM is the temperature at which the magnetisation goes to zero, which we associate with the antiferromagnetic transition in the experimental data. 

 

The lines a to e on the graph correspond to different dopings and hence different values of x.   These lines are also shown on Figure 2 which shows the theoretical phase diagram with temperature and doping, so each line a-e corresponds to a vertical line on the phase diagram.

 

The inset graph in Figure 1b sumarises the low temperature incommensurate wave vector as a function of doping and can be seen to be in very good agreement with the experimental summary inset in Figure 1a.

 

 

The complete theoretical phase diagram is presented below:

 

Figure 2

 

Beyond the Phase Modulation Only Approximation

 

Figure 1a

One can use the same free energies with the additional enhancement of allowing magnetisation and the charge modulation to vary spatially.  Rich textures and interplay between these parameters can be found. 

 

In example (a) we see a magnetic domain wall.  The magnetisation, green, changes sign.   A consequence of the phenomenalogical model is that the charge modulation will be enchanced as can be seen in the rise in the red line.  So we expect a rise in charge density in a magnetic domain wall which may explain their anomalously high resistance, 

 

In (b) we see a discomensuration.  The blue line corresponding to the incommensurate part of the wave function undergoes a jump from one value in phase with the lattice to another.   As the discommensuration occurs we can see that the magnetisation is enhanced and the charge modulation amplitude surpressed.

 

For those interested more detail can be found in the paper GC Milward, MJ Calderon & PB Littlewood Electronically soft phases in manganites;  Nature 433 (Feb 2005) 607-610

 

 

Return to CoMePhS Home Page