CoSi2 is already an important material for metalization in VLSI devices. This industrial interest provides a strong incentive to understand in detail the behavior of Co during deposition and annealing. In this talk I will discuss two sets of calculations using Plato: 1) those performed to study the relative stabilities of a number of surface and subsurface sites; 2) those performed to study the diffusion of Co in Si.
A method for obtaining spatially localized crystalline orbitals starting from delocalized Bloch Functions has been implemented in the periodic LCAO CRYSTAL code [1]; it provides a set of well localized Wannier functions (WF) through an iterative mixed Wannier-Boys scheme [2].
The WFs of seven oxygen containing compounds with increasing degree of covalent character (MgO, MnO, ZnO, Al2O3, SiO2, AlPO4 and CaSO4) [3] and of six semiconductors (Si, C, BP, AlP, SiC and BN) [4] are analyzed in terms of various indices (centroids positions, second order central moment tensor, its eigenvalues and principal axes, Mulliken population analysis and atomic localization indices) and through their graphical representations. Systematic trends are observed along the series.
As an example, Fig. 1 gives the
atomic delocalization index [5] (top) defined as:
(1)
(2)
is the bond distance,
and
is the centroid position.
Note that in SiO2, AlPO4 and CaSO4 there are two types of WFs,
identified as covalent (cv) and lone-pair (lp),
whereas in MgO, MnO, ZnO and Al2O3 there is only one type,
classified as ionic (io).

(eq. 1;
in
) and "normalized" standard deviation
(eq. 2)
of the considered oxygen containing compounds. Full and open circles refer to ionic/covalent (io, cv) and lone pair (lp) WFs, respectively.
An example of graphical representation is given in Fig. 2 for the diamond valence WF; the electronic density map and profile (see the caption for more details) are reported.

in the range
0.015-0.3
are represented. Gray dots and lines
indicate nuclei positions and the bond axes, respectively. Density in
and distances in Å.
The WFs have also been used for the calculation of dielectric properties of various compounds, in alternative to the Berry phase scheme based on the Bloch functions formalism [6,7]. The effective Born charges, spontaneous polarization and dielectric constants of various compounds are easily derived simply from the coordinates of the WF centroids [8,9].
Table 1 provides an example referring to KNbO3;
Fig. 3 shows the dependence of the
centroid position of a valence and a core WFs of BeO, on the strain
.
| Method | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | 8.073 | 1.001 | -5.964 | -1.556 | -0.0003 | 0.347 |
| LWF | 8.089 | 1.000 | -5.985 | -1.552 | 0.0004 | 0.348 |
(in
), acoustic sum
rule
(in
) and
(in C/m2)
obtained for KNbO3, by using the BP and LWF schemes.

and
Å-1 for valence and core centroids, respectively.
We present a method for obtaining well-localized Wannier-like functions (WFs) for energy bands that are attached to or mixed with other bands. The present scheme removes the limitation of the usual maximally-localized WF method [1] that the bands of interest should form an isolated group, separated by gaps from higher and lower bands everywhere in the Brillouin zone. An energy window encompassing N bands of interest is specified by the user, and the algorithm then proceeds to disentangle these from the remaining bands inside the window by filtering out an optimally connected N-dimensional subspace. This is achieved by minimizing a functional that measures the subspace dispersion across the Brillouin zone. The maximally-localized WFs for the optimal subspace are then obtained via the algorithm of Marzari and Vanderbilt [1]. The method, which functions as a postprocessing step using the output of conventional electronic-structure codes, is applied to the s and d bands of copper, and to the valence and low-lying conduction bands of silicon. For the low-lying nearly-free-electron bands of copper we find WFs which are centered at the tetrahedral interstitial sites (see right panel of the figure), suggesting an alternative tight-binding parametrization.

(light gray) and
(dark gray), where
is the volume of the primitive cell.